🔗 Share this article

"This has hardly been our best day since the election," a senior figure in government conceded following mudslinging one way and another, partly public, considerably more in private.

It began with unnamed sources to the media, this reporter included, that the Prime Minister would oppose any move to remove him - while claiming government figures, particularly the Health Secretary, were plotting challenges.

Wes Streeting asserted his loyalty remained with the Prime Minister while demanding those behind the briefings to lose their positions, with Starmer announced that any attacks on his ministers were deemed "unjustifiable".

Questions about whether the Prime Minister had approved the first reports to expose potential challengers - and if those behind them were operating with his awareness, or endorsement, were introduced to the situation.

Was there going to be a leak inquiry? Would there be sackings within what was labeled a "toxic" Downing Street operation?

What were associates of the prime minister hoping to achieve?

This reporter has been making loads of phone calls to piece together what actually happened and how all this positions the Labour government.

Stand crucial realities central of all of this: the leadership has poor ratings as is the prime minister.

These facts act as the primary motivation fueling the ongoing conversations being heard about what the party is planning to address it and potential implications concerning the timeframe the Prime Minister carries on in Downing Street.

But let's get to the aftermath of all that mudslinging.

The Repair Attempt

The prime minister and Health Secretary Wes Streeting spoke on the phone recently to patch things up.

It's understood Sir Keir said sorry to Streeting during their short conversation and they agreed to speak in further detail "in the near future".

They didn't talk about McSweeney, the PM's senior advisor - who has become a central figure for negative attention from various sources including the Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch in public to party members both junior and senior in private.

Generally acknowledged as the mastermind of the election victory and the political brain responsible for Starmer's rapid ascent since switching from his legal career, McSweeney is likewise the first to face scrutiny whenever the Downing Street machine seems to have faltered, struggled or completely malfunctioned.

There's no response to requests for comment, as some call for his removal.

Those critical of him contend that within the Prime Minister's office where he is expected to exercise numerous big political judgements, he should take responsibility for the current situation.

Others in the building insist no-one who works there initiated any leak against a cabinet minister, post the Health Secretary's comments whoever was responsible should be sacked.

Consequences

At the Prime Minister's office, there is a tacit acknowledgement that the Health Minister conducted multiple pre-arranged interviews the other day with grace, confidence and wit - despite being confronted by persistent queries regarding his aspirations since those briefings targeting him happened recently.

According to certain parliamentarians, he demonstrated a nimbleness and knack for communication they only wish the Prime Minister demonstrated.

Furthermore, it was evident that at least some of the leaks that tried to strengthen Starmer led to an opportunity for Wes to say he supported the view among fellow MPs who characterized the PM's office as hostile and discriminatory and the individuals responsible for the leaks must be fired.

Quite a situation.

"I'm a faithful" - the Health Secretary denies plan to challenge Starmer as Prime Minister.

Government Response

The prime minister, I am told, is furious regarding how the situation has developed and examining what occurred.

What seems to have gone awry, from No 10's perspective, is both quantity and tone.

Initially, they had, possibly unrealistically, imagined that the leaks would produce some news, rather than extensive leading stories.

It turned out far more significant than expected.

I'd say a PM permitting these issues be known, through allies, less than 18 months post-election, was certain to be front page top of bulletins stuff – exactly as happened, on these pages and others.

Furthermore, regarding tone, sources maintain they didn't anticipate so much talk concerning Streeting, that was subsequently massively magnified by all those interviews he was booked in to do recently.

Others, certainly, believed that that was precisely the intention.

Political Impact

These are another few days where government officials mention lessons being learnt and on the backbenches plenty are irritated at what they see as an unnecessary drama playing out that they have to firstly witness subsequently explain.

And they would rather not these actions.

However, an administration along with a PM displaying concern regarding their situation surpasses {than their big majority|their parliamentary advantage|their